Step 01 · Platform
SafetyCulture
Rate how well the SafetyCulture platform meets each requirement, with a brief justification and any assumptions.
Step 02 · Delivery Partner
Opposite
Tick all the ways Opposite can deliver — workflow mapping, customisation, integration, or bespoke build. Multiple selections expected.
Step 03 · Combined
Indicative Cost
Estimate combined SafetyCulture + Opposite delivery effort per requirement: Low, Medium or High.
SafetyCulture rating scale
1 Does not meet
2 Can meet with development
3 Minor customisations
4 Fully meets
| # | Requirement | SC Rating | SC Justification & Assumptions | WorkflowMapping | CustomisationConfigure | IntegrationAPIs / Data | BespokeTool / Module | Indicative CostCombined | Opposite Notes |
|---|
Requirements rated
0 / 25
SafetyCulture ratings completed
Fully met by SC
0
Out-of-the-box functionality
Gaps in SC
0
Rated "does not meet" or "needs development"
Where Opposite supports
0
Requirements with at least one Opposite capability
SafetyCulture rating distribution
How well the platform covers the requirement set
Opposite capabilities engaged
Across all requirements
Coverage by priority tier
Rating progress across Must, Should & Nice to Have
Indicative cost spread
Combined SafetyCulture + Opposite delivery effort
Cost is indicative — based on Opposite delivering the design, configuration and bespoke build effort needed to close gaps in SafetyCulture's out-of-the-box functionality.
Requirement-level summary
Quick scan of every requirement, SC rating, and indicative cost